However Bangkok city is well
developed, peoples are still in the phase of civilization and system is
still in the phase of like under-developing. “First Impression is the
Last Impression”. It was amazing that the driver who drive us from
subarnabhumi airport to nonthaburi (almost 40KM) hotel, charged us
700bhat plus 100 Bhat for express way charge. Me and Mr. Surya
Lamichhane both were happy reaching the hotel in time and provided the
taxi fare with additional 20Bhat as tips, but we paid a total amount of
280Bhat plus 100 Bhat at express charge while returning back from hotel
to Subarnabhumi airport following the same route . Only taxi meter is
not trustworthy, better use bill printing system too. If somebody do
overbilling then ……
Anyway,
the four days Bangkok training workshop on “IPv6 Migration Strategies
for Telecom Service Providers”, was really became the fruitful one for
me. Thorough knowledge on migration approaches has been covered.
Presentations from ISOC representatives, Japanese KDDI, Thai AIS,
Alcatel Lucent and especially the remarkable presentations with
demonstration of routing configuration from Philip Smith of APINIC helps
me to overwrite the old hard-disc of my mind with new and the recent
approaches of migration techniques.
With
my thesis on 2008, I had expected that the world would have IPv6-only
network only after 2030. “It is envisaged that the internet will
operate Dual-STACK (co-existence of IPv4 and IPv6 both) for many years
to come”. This was one of the conclusions drawn from this workshop too.
Therefore there are only three options for ISPs regarding IPv6
migration:
- Do Nothing
This is the don’t care
condition that ISPs just wait and see the world’s scenario but do
nothing and hence no market growth and once in the future may needs
rapid migration because migration is inevitable.
- Extend Life of IPv4
IPv4 address is already
exhausted as announced by APNIC. Only the solution for service providers
is to force customers to Network Address Translation (NAT). IPv4 will
be available in the market in black which they can purchase from this
black market. Or
- Deploy IPv6
However the migration
strategies are listed as: tunneling, dualstack and translation, the
tunneling approach is only for the connection among end network where
backbone network don’t support the end-network IP infrastructure and
thus tunneling can’t be taken as transition mechanism as it doesn’t
encourage towards ipv6 network expansion. Focus to transition can only
be addressed by:
Dual Stack Network:
it is the best approach for ISPs at the beginning however it depends on
sufficient IPv4 address availability. It may not interrupt the service
to clients and ipv4 can simply be discontinued once the IPv6 services
are fully operable.
6RD (Rapid Deployment):
this approach may no longer exists and is the first solution to those
ISPs whose network is not IPv6 ready to its v6 customers. It is just a
tunneling between customer end dual stack router and service provider
network gateway dual stack router to outside internet for IPv6
connectivity. This approach helps to provide quick way of accessing IPv6
to their customers.
Translation:
this approach helps to translate the addresses and headers of IPv4 into
IPv6 and vice-versa. If the service provider network is IPv6 only and
have to provide the IPv4 service to its customer, this approach is the
long term solution for ISPs for its better IPv6 services limiting ipv4
connection and finally move to IPv6 only network. Some of the approaches
are Dual-Stack Lite and Address Family Translation (AFT) also called
NAT64 (NATing for 6 to 4 conversion and vice-versa). In a native ipv6
network, a IPv4 tunnel over IPv6 network has to setup between customer
router and ISP gateway.
NAT64
approach provides only the IPv6 services to its customers and if client
wants to access IPv4 internet, a SP NAT64 gateway performs the address
and protocol translation.
(Almost all the pictures of transition approach have been copied from Philip smith’s presentation during the workshop, I thank Philip for his efforts of comprehensive teaching material)
(Almost all the pictures of transition approach have been copied from Philip smith’s presentation during the workshop, I thank Philip for his efforts of comprehensive teaching material)
In
year 2007, after I was returned back to IOE from my study visit of SOI-IPv6 network
at KEIO University, probably, I was the first person in Nepal who setup
IPv6-only network at the university network implementing NAT64 approach.
With the massive help from SFC experts, the SOI Dual Stack network was
first migrated to IPv6 network on November 2007. Hence this was the time after November
2007, Wide University SoI Network was migrated into to its
IPv6-only operable network. We used SFC NAT-PT gateway for IPv4 network
access. The technology was NAT-PT(network address and protocol
translation), which is now redefined as Stateful Address Family
Translation.
This
was the fruitful updates what I gained after Bangkok v6 training. Based
on this study, I have concluded the following road-map for Nepalese ISPs
and Telcos to move into IPv6 network.
- ISPs are not required to rely on government policy/recommendation and any migration framework. You know, on which position we are now.
- Just turn on the customer gateway and ISP gateway into dual stack mode and follow 6RD (ipv6 over ipv4 tunnel) approach at the beginning to provide IPv6 service to your clients.
- Smoothly enable your all network devices into dual stack mode. Your infrastructure is now fully operable on both networks.
- Implement Dual Stack Lite if your existing customers still prefer ipv4 services.
- Finally move to stateful AFT (NAT64) if your customers are fully migrated to IPv6 and still want to access to IPv6 internet. This is the ultimate approach after which your network is fully IPv6 only.
Following may be the national roadmap for migration:
Phase 1 (2012-2013)
-Initiation
-creation of IPv6 Task force and forum within company
coordination.
-creation of IPv6 Task force and forum within company
coordination.
Phase 2 (2013-2014)
- Conduct Awareness , Training and workshop.
Phase 3 (2014-2016)
-Single and Isolated IPv6 test-bed network
-implement 6RD for IPv6 services to clients (short term)
Phase 4 (2014-2019)
- CPE upgrade for IPv6
- enable dual stack network
- enable dual stack network
Phase 5 (2019-2024)
- process for IPv6 only network
- implement Dual Stack Lite approach
- Provide commercial IPv6 services
- follow the world’s Scenario
- Provide commercial IPv6 services
- follow the world’s Scenario
Phase 6 (2024-2030)
- enable IPv6 stack only
- Remove the tunneling and tunnel broker
- Implement AFT (NAT64) for rare ipv4 connection
- Post research and implementation after year 2028
- continue awareness, workshop, training, research and development/framework update throughout the migration period.
- Implement AFT (NAT64) for rare ipv4 connection
- Post research and implementation after year 2028
- continue awareness, workshop, training, research and development/framework update throughout the migration period.
I
thank to my workshop group 1 for creating final performance
presentation and concluded with the above road-map which will be the
recommended migration road-map for developing countries. The
presentations by each group were performed utilizing its knowledge
gained throughout the training. I was quite happy representing my group 1
to present our findings.
This
was my first trip to Bangkok. I was quite excited having tour of
Bangkok tour, however the tight program schedule limit us to towards the
Saturday only the free day for us. With the extensive help of my AIT
friend Nisarat and her friend, we entertained riding the boat, visit of
famous places like river island, grand palace and town square center
around Bangkok.
The
successful completion of my Bangkok training headed me towards the
Vientiane workshop organized by ITU (bridging the standardization gap)
at LAO PDR. On 29th July, I travelled laos for the next prestigious
workshop.
No comments:
Post a Comment